Why the numbers on a dartboard are arranged the way they are is a question that is frequently asked.
The number system on the board is often credited on a Brian Gamlin, a carpenter from Bury, Lancashire, who is said to have invented it at the age of 44 in 1896 but he died in 1903 without patenting his invention. But after extensive research by myself and by Patrick Chaplin we can find no evidence That Brian actually existed. I have personally viewed the online English and Welsh Census and contacted Bury Newspaper and Daily Mirror (see below) to see if any trace of Brain featured in their archives, unfortunately, no trace of Brian existence can be found. So how and why is Brian credited for this?
Apparently, The Daily Mirror in 1979 was asked the question “Who decided the numbers on a dartboard should be so jumbled and why?” A reply was sent and read:
"Brian Gamlin of Bury, Lancashire, introduced the odd numbering system in our fairgrounds in 1896, boasting "No Skill Required". Drunks had no chance, as a test of sobriety, the darts game 'round the clock' (in which players have to score with darts in numerical order) became a great success".
The person who is said to have replied was British based in Germany!
I wrote to the Daily Mirror requesting to see their archive and the original article with the reply, however, I was told the archive on this was no longer available. To my knowledge this is the original source stating Brian Gamlin was the person who invented the dartboard numbering system however with no further information can he truly be credited inventing the dartboard numbering system?
"21 or under wins a prize! Outside the board or fallen darts count 18!"
The Bury Times placed an article in their newspaper regarding Brian asking if any decedents or relatives of Brian lived within the area, no reply came. This is not to say he didn't exist, as some reports say that Brian was also attached to a travelling circus and may have missed the census at the time..... However, this may be one mystery that remains unsolved.
A more plausible answer may come from another source Thomas William Buckle’s son Thomas Edward Buckle.
“Thomas William Buckle invented the modern dartboard in 1913.” Thomas Edward Buckle said in a statement made in his 1992 statement in Darts World Magazine (issue 234).
Thomas William Buckle (Pictured Right) lived in Dewsbury, Yorkshire and was a wire maker wire-worker by trade It is said he took a London Fives Board, increases the number of segments to twenty, thereby creating the numbering sequence we know today and inventing the Yorkshire Dartboard.
Picture Thomas William Buckle - Dr Patrick Chaplin Darts Archive - Used with permission
The numbering system on a standard dartboard is designed in such a way as to reduce ‘lucky shots’ and reduce the element of chance. The numbers are placed in an order to encourage accuracy and punish inaccuracy. The placing of low scoring numbers either side of large numbers e.g. 1 and 5 either side of 20, 3 and 2 either side of 17, 4 and 1 either side of 18, will punish poor throwing. If you shoot for the 20 segment, the penalty for lack of accuracy is to land in either a 1 or a 5. That is basically it.
Many mathematicians have pondered the dartboard numbing sequence to see if the sequence could be further optimised. The basic answer is yes but how far off do the mathematicians say the numbering is system is off?
David F. Percy CMath FIMA, University of Salford took on the task to see if the numbering sequence could be improved on. The Original article he produced for Mathematics Today December 2012.
David came up with a new sequence as shown below that makes the scoring fairer for random throwing but will it change the current order? I don’t think so but in my view, the revised order should be considered.
To the left the Standard Dartboard Numbers and to the right the Optimised Dartboard Numbers
David's dartboard numbering system sequence is designed to have two more constraints:
The numbers go odd-even-odd-even all the way around the board
Similar clusters are spread around the board as evenly as possible.
“David said the new dartboard will make most difference at the end of a game when the rules are that a player must finish on a double.
Currently, if a player is on an odd number, and therefore needs an odd number to leave himself with an even, he can choose from the southwest sector of the board where four odds are adjacent: 7, 19, 3, and 17
Even a bad player can expect to get an odd number. But if the odds and evens alternate it becomes much more difficult.
Also, the most common finishing double to aim for is double 16, since if you miss the double and get 16, you require double 8. (And if you miss the double and get 8 you require double 4, then double 2, and then double 1.)
On a traditional board, 8 is right next to 16, which makes the game easier since you are already aiming for that section of the board.”
Very true David but also the number 32, double 16, breaks down nice and evenly meaning if you hit the big 16 the this leaves double 8 and if you hit big 8 this leave double 4
The design you have come up with gets the thumbs up form me.
Bury Council, Lancashire competition entry into Royal Horticultural Society ‘Tatton Park’s National Flowerbed Competition’ was inspired by Brian Gamlin the man credited with the modern dartboard numbering sequence. The title of the display is ’A tribute to Brian Gamlin’
In the book ‘Darts in England 1900 – 1939: A social history Dr Chaplin records that Dave Lanning (Sky Sports darts commentator) originally revealed this ‘fact’ in 1979 from information he had culled from the Daily Mirror cuttings library during his research for his ghosted biographical work on the late Welsh darts professional Leighton Rees. The Daily Mirror published details about Gamlin from a reader in Germany after a reader responded to their article ‘Who decided the numbers on a dartboard should be so jumbled and why?’
Gamlin has gone down in history based on this response and until now hasn’t been able to be traced. Gamlin was thought to be a travelling man, very possibly a showman, and thus may never be found. Indeed this story may live on without the ‘truth’ every being known.
But people in Bury, Lancashire may also wish to know that, according to Dr Chaplin there are two other people who lay claim to be the inventor of the modern dart board; the first being E. Walkers, a wire worker from Leeds. However, the most likely candidate is Thomas Buckle, a wire-worker from Dewsbury, Yorkshire, who is said to have devised the board from a ‘Five board’ a twelve-segment board which he made into a more complex twenty-segment dartboard. Buckles’ board became known as the ‘Yorkshire Dartboard’ and was later adapted in the south by the addition of the treble ring to become known as the ‘London board’.
Bury’s council’s flower display ‘A tribute to Brian Gamlin’ again begs the questions did this man ever exist? and does Bury have a claim to the invention of the modern dartboard numbering system?”
If proof cannot be found soon that a son of Bury, Lancashire invented the modern dartboard then the credit will likely as not go to a Yorkshireman!
Maybe this is the last time for someone shed more light on Gamlin!